Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 7 de 7
Filter
1.
JAMA Pediatr ; 177(6): 644-646, 2023 06 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2295597

ABSTRACT

This diagnostic study describes a dog screening program used to identify COVID-19 infections among schoolchildren.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Humans , Dogs , Animals , COVID-19/diagnosis , Schools , California/epidemiology , Pilot Projects
2.
PLoS One ; 18(3): e0283576, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2280237

ABSTRACT

COVID-19 oral treatments require initiation within 5 days of symptom onset. Although antigen tests are less sensitive than RT-PCR, rapid results could facilitate entry to treatment. We collected anterior nasal swabs for BinaxNOW and RT-PCR testing and clinical data at a walk-up, community site in San Francisco, California between January and June 2022. SARS-CoV-2 genomic sequences were generated from positive samples and classified according to subtype and variant. Monte Carlo simulations were conducted to estimate the expected proportion of SARS-CoV-2 infected persons who would have been diagnosed within 5 days of symptom onset using RT-PCR versus BinaxNOW testing. Among 25,309 persons tested with BinaxNOW, 2,799 had concomitant RT-PCR. 1137/2799 (40.6%) were SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR positive. We identified waves of predominant omicron BA.1, BA.2, BA.2.12, BA.4, and BA.5 among 720 sequenced samples. Among 1,137 RT-PCR positive samples, 788/1137 (69%) were detected by BinaxNOW; 94% (669/711) of those with Ct value <30 were detected by BinaxNOW. BinaxNOW detection was consistent over lineages. In analyses to evaluate entry to treatment, BinaxNOW detected 81.7% (361/442, 95% CI: 77-85%) of persons with COVID-19 within 5 days of symptom onset. In comparison, RT-PCR (24-hour turnaround) detected 84.2% (372/442, 95% CI: 80-87%) and RT-PCR (48-hour turnaround) detected 67.0% (296/442, 95% CI: 62-71%) of persons with COVID-19 within 5 days of symptom onset. BinaxNOW detected high viral load from anterior nasal swabs consistently across omicron sublineages emerging between January and June of 2022. Simulations support BinaxNOW as an entry point for COVID-19 treatment in a community field setting.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Humans , COVID-19/diagnosis , COVID-19/epidemiology , SARS-CoV-2/genetics , San Francisco/epidemiology , COVID-19 Drug Treatment , Immunologic Tests , Sensitivity and Specificity
3.
Ann Intern Med ; 175(5): 682-690, 2022 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1742922

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen tests are an important public health tool. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate field performance of the BinaxNOW rapid antigen test (Abbott) compared with reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) for detecting infection with the Omicron variant of SARS-CoV-2. DESIGN: Cross-sectional surveillance study. SETTING: Free, walk-up, outdoor, urban community testing and vaccine site led by Unidos en Salud, serving a predominantly Latinx community highly impacted by COVID-19. PARTICIPANTS: Persons seeking COVID-19 testing in January 2022. MEASUREMENTS: Simultaneous BinaxNOW and RT-PCR from nasal, cheek, and throat swabs, including cycle threshold (Ct) measures; a lower Ct value is a surrogate for higher amounts of virus. RESULTS: Among 731 persons tested with nasal swabs, there were 296 (40.5%) positive results on RT-PCR; 98.9% were the Omicron variant. BinaxNOW detected 95.2% (95% CI, 91% to 98%) of persons who tested positive on RT-PCR with a Ct value below 30, 82.1% (CI, 77% to 87%) of those who tested positive on RT-PCR with a Ct value below 35, and 65.2% (CI, 60% to 71%) of all who were positive on RT-PCR. Among 75 persons with simultaneous nasal and cheek swabs, BinaxNOW using a cheek swab failed to detect 91% (20 of 22) of specimens that were positive on BinaxNOW with a nasal swab. Among persons with simultaneous nasal and throat swabs who were positive on RT-PCR with a Ct value below 30, 42 of 49 (85.7%) were detected by nasal BinaxNOW, 23 of 49 (46.9%) by throat BinaxNOW, and 44 of 49 (89.8%) by either. LIMITATION: Participants were a cross-sectional sample from a community-based sentinel surveillance site, precluding study of viral or symptom dynamics. CONCLUSION: BinaxNOW detected persons with high SARS-CoV-2 levels during the Omicron surge, enabling rapid responses to positive test results. Cheek or throat swabs should not replace nasal swabs. As currently recommended, high-risk persons with an initial negative BinaxNOW result should have repeated testing. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: University of California, San Francisco.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Antigens, Viral/analysis , COVID-19/diagnosis , COVID-19 Testing , Cross-Sectional Studies , Humans , Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction , SARS-CoV-2/genetics , Sensitivity and Specificity
4.
Clin Infect Dis ; 73(9): e3098-e3101, 2021 11 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1702354

ABSTRACT

Among 3302 persons tested for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) by BinaxNOWTM and reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) in a community setting, rapid assay sensitivity was 100%/98.5%/89% using RT-PCR cycle thresholds of 30, 35, and no threshold. The specificity was 99.9%. Performance was high across ages and those with and without symptoms. Rapid resulting permitted immediate public health action.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , COVID-19 Testing , Humans , Public Health , Sensitivity and Specificity
5.
Clin Infect Dis ; 74(1): 32-39, 2022 01 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1636422

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Sequencing of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) viral genome from patient samples is an important epidemiological tool for monitoring and responding to the pandemic, including the emergence of new mutations in specific communities. METHODS: SARS-CoV-2 genomic sequences were generated from positive samples collected, along with epidemiological metadata, at a walk-up, rapid testing site in the Mission District of San Francisco, California during 22 November to 1 December, 2020, and 10-29 January 2021. Secondary household attack rates and mean sample viral load were estimated and compared across observed variants. RESULTS: A total of 12 124 tests were performed yielding 1099 positives. From these, 928 high-quality genomes were generated. Certain viral lineages bearing spike mutations, defined in part by L452R, S13I, and W152C, comprised 54.4% of the total sequences from January, compared to 15.7% in November. Household contacts exposed to the "California" or "West Coast" variants (B.1.427 and B.1.429) were at higher risk of infection compared to household contacts exposed to lineages lacking these variants (0.36 vs 0.29, risk ratio [RR] = 1.28; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.00-1.64). The reproductive number was estimated to be modestly higher than other lineages spreading in California during the second half of 2020. Viral loads were similar among persons infected with West Coast versus non-West Coast strains, as was the proportion of individuals with symptoms (60.9% vs 64.3%). CONCLUSIONS: The increase in prevalence, relative household attack rates, and reproductive number are consistent with a modest transmissibility increase of the West Coast variants. Summary: We observed a growing prevalence and modestly elevated attack rate for "West Coast" severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) variants in a community testing setting in San Francisco during January 2021, suggesting its modestly higher transmissibility.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Genomics , Humans , Incidence , San Francisco/epidemiology
6.
Cell ; 184(25): 6037-6051.e14, 2021 12 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1520752

ABSTRACT

RNA viruses generate defective viral genomes (DVGs) that can interfere with replication of the parental wild-type virus. To examine their therapeutic potential, we created a DVG by deleting the capsid-coding region of poliovirus. Strikingly, intraperitoneal or intranasal administration of this genome, which we termed eTIP1, elicits an antiviral response, inhibits replication, and protects mice from several RNA viruses, including enteroviruses, influenza, and SARS-CoV-2. While eTIP1 replication following intranasal administration is limited to the nasal cavity, its antiviral action extends non-cell-autonomously to the lungs. eTIP1 broad-spectrum antiviral effects are mediated by both local and distal type I interferon responses. Importantly, while a single eTIP1 dose protects animals from SARS-CoV-2 infection, it also stimulates production of SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibodies that afford long-lasting protection from SARS-CoV-2 reinfection. Thus, eTIP1 is a safe and effective broad-spectrum antiviral generating short- and long-term protection against SARS-CoV-2 and other respiratory infections in animal models.


Subject(s)
Capsid Proteins/genetics , Defective Interfering Viruses/metabolism , Virus Replication/drug effects , Administration, Intranasal , Animals , Antiviral Agents/pharmacology , Broadly Neutralizing Antibodies/immunology , Broadly Neutralizing Antibodies/pharmacology , COVID-19 , Capsid Proteins/metabolism , Cell Line , Defective Interfering Viruses/pathogenicity , Disease Models, Animal , Genome, Viral/genetics , Humans , Influenza, Human , Interferons/metabolism , Male , Mice , Mice, Inbred C57BL , Poliovirus/genetics , Poliovirus/metabolism , Respiratory Tract Infections/virology , SARS-CoV-2/drug effects , SARS-CoV-2/pathogenicity
7.
J Infect Dis ; 223(7): 1139-1144, 2021 04 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1183008

ABSTRACT

We evaluated the performance of the Abbott BinaxNOW rapid antigen test for coronavirus disease 2019 (Binax-CoV2) to detect virus among persons, regardless of symptoms, at a public plaza site of ongoing community transmission. Titration with cultured severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 yielded a human observable threshold between 1.6 × 104-4.3 × 104 viral RNA copies (cycle threshold [Ct], 30.3-28.8). Among 878 subjects tested, 3% (26 of 878) were positive by reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction, of whom 15 of 26 had a Ct <30, indicating high viral load; of these, 40% (6 of 15) were asymptomatic. Using this Ct threshold (<30) for Binax-CoV2 evaluation, the sensitivity of Binax-CoV2 was 93.3% (95% confidence interval, 68.1%-99.8%) (14 of 15) and the specificity was 99.9% (99.4%-99.9%) (855 of 856).


Subject(s)
Antigens, Viral/isolation & purification , COVID-19 Testing/instrumentation , COVID-19/diagnosis , Point-of-Care Testing/statistics & numerical data , SARS-CoV-2/isolation & purification , Adolescent , Adult , Asymptomatic Infections , COVID-19/transmission , COVID-19/virology , COVID-19 Testing/statistics & numerical data , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , RNA, Viral/isolation & purification , Reagent Kits, Diagnostic/statistics & numerical data , SARS-CoV-2/genetics , SARS-CoV-2/immunology , San Francisco , Sensitivity and Specificity , Time Factors , Viral Load , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL